Patient-Led Urate Self-Monitoring to Improve Clinical Outcomes in People With Gout: A Feasibility Study.

OBJECTIVE: Self-monitored point-of-care urate-measuring devices are an underexplored strategy to improve adherence to urate-lowering therapy and clinical outcomes in gout. This study observed patient-led urate self-monitoring practice and assessed its influence on allopurinol adherence, urate control, and health-related quality of life. METHODS: People with gout (n = 31) and prescribed allopurinol self-monitored their urate concentrations (HumaSens2.0plus) at baseline and thereafter monthly for 12 months (3 months per quarter). Adherence to allopurinol was measured using medication event monitoring technology (Medication Event Monitoring System cap). Time spent below the target urate concentration (<0.36 mmol/L) was determined. Health-related quality of life was measured using a survey (EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L). Gout flares were recorded. Two-tailed Spearman correlation and the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test (P < 0.05) were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Most participants were male (94%) and had urate concentrations below the target (74%) at baseline. Overall, seven participants demonstrated repeated periods of "missed doses" (two or fewer allopurinol doses missed consecutively) and "drug holidays" (three or more missed doses). Most participants (94%) persisted with allopurinol. Time spent within the target urate concentration increased 1.3-fold (from 79% to 100%; P = 0.346), and the incidence of gout flares decreased 1.6-fold (from 8 to 5; P = 0.25) in the final quarter compared to that in the first quarter of the study. Health-related quality of life was reduced for participants reporting at least one gout flare (median utility values 0.9309 vs 0.9563, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Patient-led urate self-monitoring may support the maintenance of allopurinol adherence and improve urate control, thus reducing the incidence of gout flares. Further research on patient-led urate self-monitoring in a randomized controlled study is warranted.

A Scoping Review of Pharmacogenomic Educational Interventions to Improve Knowledge and Confidence.

OBJECTIVES: Poor knowledge and confidence in pharmacogenomics are key barriers to implementation. Education of future health care professionals is required to enhance appropriate use of pharmacogenomics; however, the optimal education approach is unclear. This systematic scoping review evaluates pharmacogenomic educational interventions to improve knowledge and confidence. FINDINGS: A total of 24 studies were included. Most (90%) studies delivered pharmacogenomic education to pharmacy students and consisted of didactic lectures and workshops with case studies. To supplement case studies, self or class aggregated (52%, 12 of 23), mock (43%, 10 of 23) or faculty member provided (4%, 1 of 23) pharmacogenomic data were used in the case scenarios. All studies used quantitative methods, including student assessments and scaled surveys to assess the impact of the educational intervention on knowledge and/or confidence in pharmacogenomics. On average, the educational interventions improved knowledge acquisition by 21%, confidence in pharmacogenomic data interpretation by 37%, confidence in communication of pharmacogenomic information to patients by 41% and to health care professionals by 44%. Improvement in communication with other health care professionals was greater in students involved in interprofessional learning compared to self-pharmacogenomic testing. SUMMARY: The measures used to determine the effect of educational interventions on student knowledge and confidence varied. Innovative pedagogy, specifically interactive case-based learning and simulation such as interprofessional learning, enhances the knowledge and confidence of students in pharmacogenomics. Course-embedded self-pharmacogenomic testing may offer a supplementary, interactive component to case-based learning by using real-life reports as the foundation of knowledge and confidence acquisition.

Optimizing adherence to allopurinol for gout: patients' perspectives.

AIMS: Poor adherence to allopurinol among people with gout contributes to suboptimal gout management. This study sought to understand the facilitators and barriers to allopurinol adherence across the three stages of medication adherence, and patient perspectives on strategies to improve adherence, including self-monitoring urate concentration. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 people with gout, previously or currently taking allopurinol. De-identified verbatim transcripts were thematically analysed using an inductive and deductive approach. RESULTS: Facilitators of adherence during allopurinol initiation were motivation to prevent gout flares and trust in the advice of their healthcare professionals (HCPs). Reluctance to commence long-term medication was a barrier to allopurinol initiation. Believing in the effectiveness and necessity of allopurinol and reminder systems were facilitators of implementation. Barriers to implementation included forgetfulness, gout flares and limited feedback on allopurinol's effectiveness. Patients discontinued therapy when allopurinol was perceived as ineffective or unnecessary. Discontinuation coincided with patients experiencing gout flares while adhering to allopurinol and receiving suboptimal advice about gout management. Patients identified receiving accurate advice from HCPs and regular urate monitoring for feedback on allopurinol's effectiveness as potential strategies to improve adherence. Perceived benefits of self-monitoring urate as a strategy to promote adherence included the ability to self-manage gout and make informed decisions about allopurinol therapy with their HCP. CONCLUSION: Patient perceptions of the effectiveness and necessity of allopurinol influenced intentional adherence during medication initiation, implementation and discontinuation. Strategies that inform patients of their urate control and provide accurate medical advice have the potential to improve adherence to allopurinol.